From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 26 13:42:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5006416A412; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:42:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from postman.atlantis.dp.ua (postman.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.47.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2810443D6A; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:42:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from atlantis.dp.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postman.atlantis.dp.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k9QDgG2J012994; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:42:18 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from localhost (dmitry@localhost) by atlantis.dp.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id k9QDgGmx012991; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:42:16 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:42:16 +0300 (EEST) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov To: Andrew Reilly In-Reply-To: <20061026060221.GA47902@duncan.reilly.home> Message-ID: <20061026163228.Y89847@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> References: <17719.43574.819134.370333@roam.psg.com> <20061020005501.R32598@fledge.watson.org> <20061023060431.GA3186@duncan.reilly.home> <453D9F1A.5040803@FreeBSD.org> <20061026060221.GA47902@duncan.reilly.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Randy Bush , Robert Watson , Doug Barton , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: 5 to 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:42:37 -0000 Hello! On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Andrew Reilly wrote: > How would I be able to tell? tunefs -p lists ACLs and MAC root@test# dumpfs /|head -1 magic 11954 (UFS1) time Thu Oct 26 17:53:53 2006 Yes, this is for RELENG_4 compatibility. > multlabel and soft updates, but of those only soft updates is > enabled, so I don't know if that is conclusive. Did UFS2 give > us anything beyond ACLs and largeness? bsdlabel, mount and df > don't seem to give any particular indication... I've found file creation time (UFS2-only recent addition, see e.g. ls -U) _very_ useful. It always made me wonder why UNIX doesn't support such a basic and useful functionality (all DEC's ODS-* filesystems support it IIRC). Now I can e.g. issue 'ls -lU /var/db/pkg' and this will show when each package was _installed_ (and not _modified_ as plain 'ls -l' shows). For UFS1 ls -lU always gives "Jan 1 1970" ;) Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE