From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 14:52:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02EF916A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:52:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from shellma.zin.lublin.pl (shellma.zin.lublin.pl [212.182.126.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE6743D58 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:52:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl) Received: by shellma.zin.lublin.pl (Postfix, from userid 1018) id DFDF35F103; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:03:51 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:03:51 +0100 From: Pawel Malachowski To: Michael Sierchio Message-ID: <20040114230351.GE72981@shellma.zin.lublin.pl> References: <20040114224851.GC72981@shellma.zin.lublin.pl> <4005C71A.3070506@tenebras.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4005C71A.3070506@tenebras.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw not not X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:52:30 -0000 On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 02:47:54PM -0800, Michael Sierchio wrote: > and you have an aversion to writing 1-299,501-8192 ? (8192 was chosen as > the loopback MTU size). I simply believe displaying `not not' is not intentional and I'm reporting this here without opening PR. -- Paweł Małachowski