From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 31 14:44:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F3116AFEE for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 14:44:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFFF43D55 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 14:44:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 29183 invoked from network); 31 May 2006 14:44:32 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 31 May 2006 14:44:32 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3E2B72844C; Wed, 31 May 2006 10:44:31 -0400 (EDT) To: "Iantcho Vassilev" References: <18e02bd30605290545j1c9cceebwedc8d28bbf270e11@mail.gmail.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 10:44:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <18e02bd30605290545j1c9cceebwedc8d28bbf270e11@mail.gmail.com> (Iantcho Vassilev's message of "Mon, 29 May 2006 15:45:20 +0300") Message-ID: <44ac8y1cfk.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: kern.ipc.somaxconn should be high for a PF firewall with a lot of states X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Mailing List List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 14:44:37 -0000 "Iantcho Vassilev" writes: > kern.ipc.somaxconn is for handling more incoming connections,right? Well, kind of. It's a systemwide limit on the maximum number of connections that a given socket can accept. > but does > firewall connections are considered incoming? No, not really. But the question doesn't really make sense. What are you trying to do? -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/