From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sat Aug 6 17:16:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32877BB0CAD; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 17:16:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F142411B2; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 17:16:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bW5D9-0006yZ-AO; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 19:16:35 +0200 Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 19:16:35 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Ultima Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc scripts new login_class, default can break old rc scripts Message-ID: <20160806171635.GT96200@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 17:16:34 -0000 Hi! > So my question is this, should old rc scripts adapt to this new default, or > should the default be changed to avoid issues like I just found? There should be a PR about this, and please give it to re (release engineering). -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go !