From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Apr 20 3:19:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from raven.ecs.soton.ac.uk (raven.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.70.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1AF37B41F for ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 03:19:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hawk.ecs.soton.ac.uk (hawk.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.68.142]) by raven.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA24402; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 11:19:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from login.ecs.soton.ac.uk (IDENT:tjc@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.68.149]) by hawk.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA12108; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 11:19:22 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 11:19:22 +0100 (BST) From: Tim Chown To: Pekka Savola Cc: itojun@iijlab.net, Robert , 6bone <6bone@ISI.EDU>, ipv6users , freebsd-stable Subject: Re: A DNS question re 6to6/IPv6 host IN A records. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Pekka Savola wrote: > That is true, but it may have it's drawbacks. Often, still, IPv6 > connectivity is worse than with IPv4. People who are dual-stack will use > IPv6 when trying to reach 'nanguo'. It may be more unoptimal yet. > > For conservative IPv6 adoption, I recommend the former (at least first). > For more radical IPv6 adoption, and for non-production services, the > latter is usually more suitable. You also want to be very careful with services where you use a common name space, one example with an I-D wtitten for it being MX hosts. Tim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message