From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 08:18:00 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF9E16A4B3; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5798243FE3; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:18:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC582A8DD; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:18:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Jeff Roberson In-Reply-To: <200309300452.h8U4qOgv043882@repoman.freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:18:00 -0700 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20030930151800.3EC582A8DD@canning.wemm.org> cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/amd64 genassym.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:18:01 -0000 Jeff Roberson wrote: > jeff 2003/09/29 21:52:24 PDT > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/amd64/amd64 genassym.c > Log: > - Remove the definition for TD_SWITCHIN as it is not used. > > Approved by: peter Mostly as an FYI to everybody else.. While I appreciate getting to have a quick sanity check on this stuff, by no means do I consider a 'lock' being held here. There are some lower level differences between i386 and amd64 kernels, but for the most part, the rest is essentially the same. The syntactic differences (register names, lack of things like VM86, sizes etc) account for most of the differences and they are pretty obvious. I do appreciate people taking their best shot at doing parallel commits to the amd64 tree, even if it hasn't been compile tested on amd64. Having said that, sledge.freebsd.org is available, and its a pretty damn quick machine. It'll be better when the SMP code is finished (I've got it compiling, it needs some of the startup code rewritten) though. I've found myself taking advantage of its speed when doing compile tests on MI parts of the kernel or tree. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5