From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Dec 31 10:31: 1 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE4A37B4DE for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 10:30:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from energyhq.homeip.net (213-97-200-73.uc.nombres.ttd.es [213.97.200.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678FD43EA9 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 10:30:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from flynn@energyhq.homeip.net) Received: from christine.energyhq.tk (christine.energyhq.tk [192.168.0.1]) by energyhq.homeip.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C0C0EAF585; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 19:30:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 19:30:43 +0100 From: Miguel Mendez To: Cliff Sarginson Cc: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: adduser .. revisited, an apology .. oh come on Message-Id: <20021231193043.5e3f684f.flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20021231181631.GC7194@raggedclown.net> References: <20021230084202.0530d91e.nospam@hiltonbsd.com> <00c301c2b012$adcf7770$0300000a@lyon> <20021231051803.GM215@vectors.cx> <20021231181631.GC7194@raggedclown.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0) X-Face: 1j}k*2E>Y\+C~E|/wehi[:dCM,{N7/uE 3o# P,{t7gA/qnovFDDuyQV.1hdT7&#d)q"xY33}{_GS>kk'S{O]nE$A`T|\4&p\&mQyexOLb8}FO List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 19:16:31 +0100 Cliff Sarginson wrote: > Adding a user should not be rocket science, It isn't. > If the old time Bill Joy lovers would realise that 'csh" sucks big > time, we may avoid a lot of problems. You can always use /bin/sh, and yes, it does history (set -o emacs) > If anyone can prove to me that "csh" is superior in any respect to > bash, then please tell me. -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 841916 Dec 31 15:16 /bin/tcsh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1036396 Nov 17 13:30 /usr/local/bin/bash tcsh is good enough for interactive use (others like zsh as well), and many people have grown to hate bash for one very simple reason. In another attempt at 'embrace and extend', GNU added some features to plain sh that remained functional even when invoked as /bin/sh. That lead to broken scripts that only ran on GNU/Linux systems. Now I feel fad for feeding a troll, let this thread die already :) Happy new year. -- Miguel Mendez - flynn@energyhq.homeip.net GPG Public Key :: http://energyhq.homeip.net/files/pubkey.txt EnergyHQ :: http://www.energyhq.tk Of course it runs NetBSD! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message