From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 9 22:53:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DACC16A4CE; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 22:53:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE49C43D3F; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 22:53:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-b154.otenet.gr [212.205.244.162]) j09MrsQC012152; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:53:55 +0200 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j09MrrM9038639; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:53:53 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j09MrrDj038619; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:53:53 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:53:53 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Eric Kjeldergaard Message-ID: <20050109225353.GF832@gothmog.gr> References: <736EAA55-5B8B-11D9-ACB2-000A95C969C6@zumbrunn.com> <20050102110732.GB861@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20050103232207.GA44980@gothmog.gr> <9FC79942-5DE3-11D9-BEAB-000A95C969C6@zumbrunn.com> <20050108144127.GA75006@sumuk.de> <8B30EFDE-6195-11D9-A996-000A95C969C6@zumbrunn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: cc: "Simon L.Nielsen" cc: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Rework of the FreeBSD website [was:FreeBSD'sVisualIdentity:Outdated?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 22:53:58 -0000 On 2005-01-09 16:17, Eric Kjeldergaard wrote: > Something we do a lot at my workplace (web development firm, mostly) > is to have underlines on rollovers and (on some sites unselected, > depending of course on user preference). I would prefer to not see > the blue underlined if we could avoid it. Of course with the modern > css technology, it's not an issue because any user that wants blue > underlined links (vision impairment, personal preference, etc) can > override the link colour via his/her client. Having the links that > have been selected still visible (especially on rollover) but "faded > out" in some form into the regular text makes a lot of things more > readable. > > Just a thought, Eric All good ideas, IMHO. Thanks for sharing them with us, Eric!