From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 8 17:21:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EEB216A488 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 17:21:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etc@fluffles.net) Received: from auriate.fluffles.net (cust.95.160.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.95.160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9B613C48E for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 17:21:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etc@fluffles.net) Received: from destiny ([10.0.0.21]) by auriate.fluffles.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HFCxN-000OyV-3e for freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:21:13 +0100 Message-ID: <45CB5C5E.2040603@fluffles.net> Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:22:38 +0100 From: Fluffles User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org References: <1170861895.87827.8.camel@localhost> <45CA1107.1020609@fluffles.net> <45CB2DE8.1090609@fluffles.net> <45CB391F.6070903@fluffles.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: External HDD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:21:22 -0000 Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 2/8/07, Fluffles wrote: >> Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: >> > Hmm, Samsung 3,5" drives are rather cheap these days, >> > look like a bargain to me. I remember they were regarded >> > as a bit slow, but stable some years ago, wonder if that >> > is still true... >> >> The Samsung T166 500GB drive not only has the highest GB-per-euro/dollar >> ratio but is also the fastest drive in terms of Sequential Transfer Rate >> (STR); beating even the WD Raptor; though i have to say random I/O >> performance is much more important than STR. > > What I'm worried the most about is reliability. I would > settle for 10Mb/sec performance if I had a guarantee it > would work 24x7x365 for 10 years straight... No drive is reliable enough; dire truth. That's why RAID is so popular these days. Build yourself a nice NAS server and use geom_raid5 on it to provide for reliability. :) - V