From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 12 09:54:44 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0D4106566B;
	Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F358FC16;
	Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:54:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
	[212.40.38.100])
	by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id LAA01377;
	Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:54:41 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
	by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD))
	id 1RlHMn-000E2a-Gr; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:54:41 +0200
Message-ID: <4F0EADE1.9070803@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:54:41 +0200
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lev@FreeBSD.org
References: <1379921442.20120112133112@serebryakov.spb.ru>
In-Reply-To: <1379921442.20120112133112@serebryakov.spb.ru>
X-Enigmail-Version: undefined
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, jhb@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE / NetGraph interaction broken somwhere between r227874
 and r229818
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:54:44 -0000

on 12/01/2012 11:31 Lev Serebryakov said the following:
>  Switching to 4BSD helps. 4BSD works as usual: all CPU time is
>  interrupts and network thread, system is responsive under heaviest load,
>  normal operations of DNS, DHCP and hostapd.

How reproducible is this result?
In other words, have you definitely ruled out all other factors besides the
scheduler?

-- 
Andriy Gapon