From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 25 17:26:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49FD5106568B for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stom@free.fr) Received: from smtp21.orange.fr (smtp21.orange.fr [80.12.242.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29FD8FC1B for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp21.orange.fr (mwinf2116 [10.232.7.116]) by mwinf2105.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 55DD51C02A48 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:02:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf2116.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7E0F91C0008B for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:02:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf2116.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7020C1C000A3 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:02:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from btn.mine.nu (ALyon-256-1-82-178.w90-9.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.9.89.178]) by mwinf2116.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4AB9D1C0008B for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:02:43 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20090925130243306.4AB9D1C0008B@mwinf2116.orange.fr Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by btn.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 503F835C24 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:01:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at btn.mine.nu Received: from btn.mine.nu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (btn.mine.nu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6j1n7ZXcQiNV for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:01:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (winux [192.168.1.150]) by btn.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950F935BF6 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:01:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4ABCBF7E.5050805@free.fr> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:02:54 +0200 From: Philippe Laquet User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200909241735.n8OHZMVM099476@fire.js.berklix.net> <86my4jnqv9.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86my4jnqv9.fsf@ds4.des.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 090924-0, 24/09/2009), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: why no Oracle on FreeBSD ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:26:09 -0000 Dag-Erling Smørgrav a écrit : > Saifi Khan writes: > >> The response seems to suggest [...] >> > > ...nothing except that whoever wrote it has absolutely no idea what > they're talking about. > > DES > I know that the question was about "native" FreeBSD port but did someone tried / used Oracle on top of Linux binary Emulation? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/linuxemu-oracle.html I was just wondering about limitations and performance issues using that way...