From owner-cvs-all Thu Feb 8 10: 6:40 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from gratis.grondar.za (grouter.grondar.za [196.7.18.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF33E37B6A1; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:06:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from grondar.za (root@gratis.grondar.za [196.7.18.133]) by gratis.grondar.za (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f18I5I901871; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 20:05:25 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <200102081805.f18I5I901871@gratis.grondar.za> To: Bruce Evans Cc: Mike Heffner , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/lam lam.c References: In-Reply-To: ; from Bruce Evans "Fri, 09 Feb 2001 03:13:28 +1100." Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 20:05:49 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Mark Murray wrote: > > > > This just breaks K&R support and adds style bugs (spaces after function > > > names, and **argv instead of *argv[]). > > > > K&R support is not important anymore. > > Some disagree. It is only not very important IMO. Not worth the effort > to throw it away. It is as important as maintaining BCPL compatability. Far more worthwhile (if you really want K&R-ability) is to make sure your favourite ANSI --> K&R tool is up to the job. > > Spaces after function names is not good, I agree, and the **argv --> > > *argv[] thing should happen. > > I hope you mean backing out of the *argv[] -> **argv thing. I normally > use **argv, but both style(9) and the ISO C standard use *argv[]. Erm, I mean that *argv[] is better than **argv. M -- Mark Murray Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message