From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 16:14:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66ED816A420 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:14:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xvalen@atlas.cz) Received: from tron.kn.vutbr.cz (tron.kn.vutbr.cz [147.229.191.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4302243D49 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:14:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xvalen@atlas.cz) Received: from a03-0622d.kn.vutbr.cz (a03-0622d.kn.vutbr.cz [147.229.214.112]) by tron.kn.vutbr.cz (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with SMTP id j9HGEQP3031313 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:14:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from xvalen@atlas.cz) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:14:21 +0200 From: Petr Valenta To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20051017181421.8b429614.xvalen@atlas.cz> In-Reply-To: <20051017151546.GA68987@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr> References: <200510150015.j9F0ExKr085847@sakura.ninth-nine.com> <5739E97B-7EDC-4971-9EA5-01A44688A981@softweyr.com> <43522953.6050700@ebs.gr> <200510161310.18807.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> <20051017170146.60b1b90b.xvalen@atlas.cz> <20051017151546.GA68987@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.3 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.70, clamav-milter version 0.70j X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Scanned-By: milter-spamc/0.19.268 (tron [147.229.191.152]); Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:14:27 +0200 X-Spam-Status: NO, hits=0.50 required=6.00 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tron.kn.vutbr.cz", has tested this incoming email. See other headers to know if the email has beed identified as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. ____ Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 6.0 required) ____ pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------- 0.9 DATE_MISSING Missing Date: header -0.3 BAYES_30 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 30 to 40% [score: 0.3722] ____ Subject: Re: [SUGGEST] Reform eclipse and eclipse related ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:14:30 -0000 On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:15:46 +0200 Herve Quiroz wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 05:01:46PM +0200, Petr Valenta wrote: > > I agree, > > many people don't need eclipse and puting it into whole port > > collection is bad because there will be no way to disable fetching > > eclipse-* with cvsup...I think that /usr/ports/eclipse/ will be the > > best solution. > > Actually I believe you can set up a refuse file to disable fetching > Eclipse stuff with cvsup. Something like that should do the trick: > > $ find /usr/ports -type d -name 'eclipse*' -mindepth 2 -maxdepth 2 \ > | sed 's|^/usr/||' >> > > Anyway, I don't think this is really an issue... > > Herve Of course, but I thinks that /usr/ports/eclipse is much more transparent but it's only my feeling. Petr > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >