From owner-freebsd-current Sat Jun 15 19: 8:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from thuvia.demon.co.uk (thuvia.demon.co.uk [193.237.34.248]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF83D37B41A; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 19:08:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dotar.thuvia.org (dotar.thuvia.org [10.0.0.4]) by phaidor.thuvia.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5G28NN49163; Sun, 16 Jun 2002 03:08:24 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk) Received: (from mark@localhost) by dotar.thuvia.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g5G28Mw98513; Sun, 16 Jun 2002 03:08:22 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark) Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 03:08:22 +0100 (BST) From: Mark Valentine Message-Id: <200206160208.g5G28Mw98513@dotar.thuvia.org> In-Reply-To: Terry Lambert's message of Jun 15, 8:05pm X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.6 beta(5) 10/07/98) To: tlambert2@mindspring.com (Terry Lambert), Maxime Henrion Subject: Re: duplicate -ffreestanding in kernel build Cc: current@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > From: tlambert2@mindspring.com (Terry Lambert) > Date: Sat 15 Jun, 2002 > Subject: Re: duplicate -ffreestanding in kernel build > That is an incredibly *fugly* "optimization". It assumes that I > use libc, unless I have "-ffreestanding", and it assumes my > implementation of printf vs. puts. It means you can't futz with the implementation of the standard library in a standard way. :-) Cheers, Mark. -- Mark Valentine, Thuvia Labs "Tigers will do ANYTHING for a tuna fish sandwich." Mark Valentine uses "We're kind of stupid that way." *munch* *munch* and endorses FreeBSD -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message