From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 13 06:03:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6188A16A418 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 06:03:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otto@drijf.net) Received: from vera.drijf.net (vera.xs4all.nl [213.84.84.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE04843D48 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 06:03:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from otto@drijf.net) Received: from lou.intra.drijf.net (otto@lou.intra.drijf.net [10.0.1.14]) by vera.drijf.net (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5D63Hrf008005 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:03:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:03:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Otto Moerbeek X-X-Sender: otto@lou.intra.drijf.net To: Ted Mittelstaedt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 11:44:08 +0000 Cc: John Nemeth , misc@openbsd.org, Ted Unangst , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=E1morszky_Bal=E1zs?= , netbsd-users@NetBSD.org, Nikolas Britton Subject: Re: wikipedia article X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 06:03:43 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: John Nemeth [mailto:jnemeth@victoria.tc.ca] > >Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 1:15 PM > >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Nikolas Britton; Ted Unangst > >Cc: Hamorszky Balazs; misc@openbsd.org; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; > >netbsd-users@NetBSD.org > >Subject: RE: wikipedia article > > > > > >On Nov 1, 6:11pm, "Ted Mittelstaedt" wrote: > >} > >} Prior to the release of the 80386 the Intel processors didn't have > >} memory protection which was a requirement of any processor running > >} the BSD kernel. > > > > This is not entirely true. The 80286 had memory protection. > >However, its memory protection was completely based on segments (i.e. > >it could not do paging). > > Oh, yeah, your right about that. Me bad. > > >Also, it was only a 16 bit processor. > > What was the bit size of the CPU's originally used to write UNIX in Bell > Labs? What's more, iirc the MMU of the pdp11 isn't what we call a MMU today, it could not even do paging. -Otto