From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug  4 20:55:11 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E058C1065673
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon,  4 Aug 2008 20:55:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from prvs=pschmehl_lists=09551e61c@tx.rr.com)
Received: from ip-relay-001.utdallas.edu (ip-relay-001.utdallas.edu
	[129.110.20.111])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04318FC28
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon,  4 Aug 2008 20:55:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from prvs=pschmehl_lists=09551e61c@tx.rr.com)
X-Group: RELAYLIST
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,306,1215406800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="5905299"
Received: from smtp3.utdallas.edu ([129.110.20.110])
	by ip-relay-001.utdallas.edu with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2008 15:26:38 -0500
Received: from utd65257.utdallas.edu (utd65257.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp3.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B174323DEA
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon,  4 Aug 2008 15:26:38 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:26:38 -0500
From: Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com>
To: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <24E2FE8AA9A40D2EE14DF4F7@utd65257.utdallas.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20080804201806.GA50143@nagual.pp.ru>
References: <56E45E0F-29D4-4CA8-9936-384405AB874A@mac.com>
	<4897518D.4090001@FreeBSD.org> <20080804201806.GA50143@nagual.pp.ru>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86)
X-Munged-Reply-To: Figure it out
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: bsd-grep-20080725_1 -v flag busted...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists_nada@tx.rr.com>
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:55:12 -0000

--On Tuesday, August 05, 2008 00:18:07 +0400 Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> 
wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 08:59:25PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
>> thanks for your notes. It seems very strange to me, because GNU grep
>> produces the same output for me. Apart from this, the -v flag was really
>> broken, but I applied some fixes before updating the port and in the
>> version, which I committer, I thought that the -v flag was compatible.
>>
>> Here is what I get at the moment:
>>
>>  > echo 'fee\nfi\nfoe\nfum' | ./grep -v fi
>>  > echo 'fee\nfi\nfoe\nfum' | /usr/bin/grep -v fi
>
> Example is broken, echo (for sh) supposed to be
>
> echo 'fee
> fi
> foe
> fum' | ...

Are you sure it's grep that's broken?

pauls@utd65257# echo 'fee\nfi\nfoe\nfum'
fee\nfi\nfoe\nfum

-- 
Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst
As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions
are my own and not those of my employer.
*******************************************
Check the headers before clicking on Reply.