From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 14 17:28:19 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4E516A4CE
	for <chat@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 17:28:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail2.cableone.net [24.116.0.122])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D4B43D58
	for <chat@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 17:28:18 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kitbsdlist2@HotPOP.com)
Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified
	[24.119.122.191]) 
	by smail2.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 5432804 
	for multiple; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 10:14:41 -0700
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:27:26 -0500
From: Vulpes Velox <kitbsdlist2@HotPOP.com>
To: Paul Robinson <paul@iconoplex.co.uk>
Message-Id: <20040614122726.7ab21a86@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040614144259.GA4684@iconoplex.co.uk>
References: <20040614144259.GA4684@iconoplex.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.11claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com
cc: chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Stealthy?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Non technical items related to the community
	<freebsd-chat.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 17:28:19 -0000

On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 15:42:59 +0100
Paul Robinson <paul@iconoplex.co.uk> wrote:

> Apparently, we're part of, and using the products of a stealth
> project:
> 
> http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3367381
> 
> Which inevitably led to one of Slashdot's amusing (sic) BSD
> articles:
> 
> http://bsd.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/06/13/2241255&mode=nested&tid=122&tid=185&tid=190&threshold=-1
> 
> All I can say is, with 2.5 million hosted unique domain names, 4 out
> of 10 of the top hosting providers for stability and ~ 400 CVS bits
> set, this must be the worst example of stealth I've ever seen. From
> now on, I think core@ should be known as "The Bilderberg Group",
> hackers@ should be constrained to Freemasons and chat@ should
> concentrate on talking about how great Windows is to distract
> everybody else.

I liked on of the comments i read on /. "FreeBSD is a "stealthy" open
source project in the same way the Brooklyn Bridge [nyc.gov] is a
"stealthy" public works project"