From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 16 23:20:10 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A24A16A468; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:20:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sos@deepcore.dk) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-70484.0x50a6c9a6.abnxx16.customer.tele.dk [80.166.201.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DC613C469; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:20:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sos@deepcore.dk) Received: from ws.local (ws.deepcore.dk [194.192.25.137]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lAGNK84j055042; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:20:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos@deepcore.dk) Message-ID: <473E25A7.2020101@deepcore.dk> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:20:07 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Poul-Henning Kamp References: <33907.1195254953@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <33907.1195254953@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, Scott Long , src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, Nate Lawson Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ata atapi-cd.c atapi-cd.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:20:10 -0000 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <473E238D.4030800@samsco.org>, Scott Long writes: > =20 >> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> =20 > > =20 >>>> Well, there are two questions: media present (yes/no) and drive cap= able >>>> of telling if media present without just trying to read it (yes/no).= >>>> =20 >>> This risk reopening the old religious war if drivers should poll >>> their drives to be up to date on media existence. >>> =20 >> This has nothing to do with polling, you're just trotting out an=20 >> irrelevant argument to divert attention. >> =20 > > No, I merely pointed out that Nates worries had an obvious and widely > accepted solution, which unfortunately is religiously unacceptable > in certain parts of FreeBSD storage subsystems. > > For all I know, the problem sos@ has complained about has a solution > that just needs somebody to change the relevant few lines of code. > =20 Exactly, and until that has been hashed out I rest my case, I have=20 better things todo. -S=F8ren