From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 22:04:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811DB16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:04:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.chesapeake.net (chesapeake.net [208.142.252.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75FD743FE9 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:04:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from localhost (jroberson@localhost) by mail.chesapeake.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8T54nT64217; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 01:04:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 01:04:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Jeff Roberson To: Morten Rodal In-Reply-To: <20030928101535.GA5209@slurp.rodal.no> Message-ID: <20030929010425.L99666-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of SCHED_ULE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 05:04:59 -0000 On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:31:25PM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Morten Rodal wrote: > > > It has improved quite a bit lately, and is now also working with KSE. > > > However, the mouse will get sluggish whenever the computer is under > > > bursts of load (i.e. a compile) > > > > > > > I have not had this experience. Can you give me details of your machine > > and the kind of load that causes slugishness? I'll correct it as soon as > > I can identify it. > > > > The machine is an dual Pentium 2 300MHz, and I'm running gnome 2.4. > I do also experience this with my computer at school, a single Pentium3 > 733MHz. > > The load isn't very complicated, usually just gnome 2.4 and mozilla > firebird running. If I then do anything that requires lots of cpu, > like a compile of a program, the interactivity drops fast. > > On the dual machine I have also experienced a *HUGE* increase in the > time for "portupgrade -ar" to complete. I am not familiar with how > portupgrade works, but it seems to spawn a few make's and sort's, but > I am not sure why it is currently using 3 hours instead of 10 minutes > to complete! (This was tested when there was no packages to upgrade, > which shouldn't take long) > > Both machines (this dual and the one at school) are running with a > libmap.conf in order to use libkse, is this perhaps affecting the > performance of ULE? It could be. Can you try with libthr or libc_r and let me know? > > I am not sure how useful this is to you, but if you have any other > pointers as to what I should look at just ask. > > -- > Morten Rodal > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >