From owner-cvs-all Wed Apr 25 9:39:46 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from cluck.stealthchickens.org (cluck.stealthchickens.org [209.192.217.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B695B37B43C; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 09:39:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from guinness.osdn.com (root@cluck.stealthchickens.org [209.192.217.153]) by cluck.stealthchickens.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f3PGdWI90391; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 12:39:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jim@FreeBSD.org) Received: by guinness.osdn.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9512C9C; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 12:39:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 12:39:31 -0400 From: Jim Mock To: Doug Barton Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, anders@fix.no, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/imap-uw Makefile distinfo pkg-message ports/mail/imap-uw/files patch-ac patch-ah patch-ai Message-ID: <20010425123931.A53267@guinness.osdn.com> Reply-To: jim@FreeBSD.org References: <200104250543.f3P5hXc80256@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010425111050.B49519@guinness.osdn.com> <3AE6FBEF.188F7673@DougBarton.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: <3AE6FBEF.188F7673@DougBarton.net>; from DougB@DougBarton.net on Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:31:43AM -0700 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 at 09:31:43 -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Jim Mock wrote: > > > > On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 at 22:43:33 -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > > dougb 2001/04/24 22:43:33 PDT > > > > > > Modified files: > > > mail/imap-uw Makefile distinfo pkg-message > > > mail/imap-uw/files patch-ac patch-ah patch-ai > > > Log: > > > Update to 0104241750. The maintainer submitted an update for the > > > previous version, however they _just_ updated the version today. > > > The only thing I did differently from the maintainer's patch was > > > to regen patch-ai. > > > > Is there any particular reason why this port is following the betas > > that seem to change every other day and leave it broken instead of > > 2000c? I don't use this port or even IMAP, I just noticed that > > people are always complaining about it being broken on -ports. Just > > curious. > > I'm starting to think that we need an imap-uw-devel category for this, > and that we should revert imap-uw to 2000c. I do use this port, and > the last two snapshots have resulted in a problem where mail that I > delete keeps coming back from the trash marked unread. I think having an imap-uw-devel port would be a good thing. - jim -- - jim mock - O|S|D|N - open source development network - - http://www.freebsdzine.org/ - jim@freebsdzine.org - jim@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message