From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Feb 17 1:36:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from stephens.ml.org (cm2081634025.ponderosa.ispchannel.com [208.163.40.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A169F10E71 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 1999 01:36:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tas@stephens.ml.org) Received: from stephens.ml.org (localhost.loc [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by stephens.ml.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA23720; Wed, 17 Feb 1999 09:36:20 GMT (envelope-from tas@stephens.ml.org) Message-Id: <199902170936.JAA23720@stephens.ml.org> To: Jim Pirzyk Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, Thomas Stephens From: Thomas Stephens Subject: Re: ksh93? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 16 Feb 1999 09:12:26 EST." <99021609142800.16420@amigo.faf.fa.disney.com> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 01:36:19 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jim Pirzyk wrote: >I have been using the BSDI version for a long time now (2 - 3 years) >and I have not had any problems with it. I would be interested in >a native FreeBSD version and how much faster it would run. > >pirzyk@amigo:~ >1>file /bin/ksh >/bin/ksh: BSD/OS i386 compact demand paged executable not stripped Thanks for the info! Is the BSDI ksh part of BSD/OS (i.e. is a BSD/OS licence necessary to use it)? One other thing: do you know which version it is (93 or 88)? Thomas Stephens tas@stephens.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message