From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 22:47:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF6F16A453; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:47:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mv.twc.weather.com (mv.twc.weather.com [65.212.71.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096E843D4C; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:47:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [10.50.41.231] (Not Verified[65.202.103.25]) by mv.twc.weather.com with NetIQ MailMarshal (v6, 0, 3, 8) id ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:01:11 -0400 From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:28:25 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200506091423.39940@harrymail> <20050622154538.H26664@fledge.watson.org> <20050622150842.GF791@empiric.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20050622150842.GF791@empiric.icir.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506231828.27226.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Emanuel Strobl , Bruce M Simpson , Robert Watson , Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= Subject: Re: lapic@2k interrukts eating CPU cycles X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:47:42 -0000 On Wednesday 22 June 2005 11:08 am, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 03:50:24PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > > I have a feature request in to John to add statistics gathering on IPIs, > > since he's currently reworking the interrupt paths. > > I like this LAPIC change a lot. Actually I like APICs a lot. They may not > give you 'real' vectored hardware interrupts a la SPARC and PowerPC, but > at least it comes a bit closer. > > It would be nice to be doing APIC on uniprocessor systems a bit further > down the line, but that's for the wishlist -- the 8259s are not going away > just yet. I think all new systems going forward are going to have APICs though. HTT and multi core require APIC just like SMP does. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org