From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu May 18 03:13:17 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA04495
          for ports-outgoing; Thu, 18 May 1995 03:13:17 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA04488
          for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 18 May 1995 03:13:07 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id DAA06784; Thu, 18 May 1995 03:12:39 -0700
Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 03:12:39 -0700
Message-Id: <199505181012.DAA06784@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw
CC: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSI.3.91.950518174506.876B-100000@leo> (message from Brian Tao on Thu, 18 May 1995 17:45:51 +0800 (CST))
Subject: Re: tcsh 6.06
From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=)
Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 *     Okay, I'll do it that way then.  It would be nice to have this on
 * the 2.0.5 CD-ROM, if there is enough time left.

Only if we can get together a team of sufficient number of people
(say, 20) and let them test it real quick.  Note that we have been in
"no upgrades" code freeze mode for four days already.

Putting stuff in the tree is not the problem here, but testing is.
This is a very important component of the system, I'd rather ship the
CDROM with and old and trusty version than a new and untested version.

Satoshi