From owner-freebsd-fs Mon Sep 25 5:41:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mail-relay.eunet.no (mail-relay.eunet.no [193.71.71.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30DB37B42C for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 05:40:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from login-1.eunet.no (login-1.eunet.no [193.75.110.2]) by mail-relay.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.9.3/GN) with ESMTP id OAA44078; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 14:40:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) Received: from localhost (mbendiks@localhost) by login-1.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA79016; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 14:40:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) X-Authentication-Warning: login-1.eunet.no: mbendiks owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 14:40:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Marius Bendiksen To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: Dwight Tuinstra , freebsd-fs Subject: Re: Journaling Filesystems in bsd? (LFS, anyone?) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > If NetBSD has an LFS, I think it would be best to port that and strive > to remain compatible with NetBSD rather than invent our own stuff. Actually, the LFS that has been ressurected in NetBSD is also available in FreeBSD on old systems. It got yanked at LFS_RETIRE. Anyway, the implementation is apparently rather proof-of-concept stage, as I've heard, so you might actually do well to join up with the NetBSD people to make a more proper such filesystem. Or, get someone to port WAFL, and get NVRAM. Marius To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message