From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Apr 10 00:06:05 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA20051 for hardware-outgoing; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 00:06:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA20045 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 00:06:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id AAA20828; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 00:03:23 -0700 (PDT) To: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" cc: Anthony.Kimball@east.sun.com, dave@persprog.com, hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Pentuim or Pentuim Pro ? In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 09 Apr 1997 22:50:16 PDT." <199704100550.WAA28389@MindBender.serv.net> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 00:03:23 -0700 Message-ID: <20825.860655803@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > [...] > >example, when I convert to an indirect solver. (Actually, the real > >price-performance win in the near future is Alpha. When the AlphaPC > >boards plateau -- in a month or two, perhaps? -- I'm going to have to > >seriously consider switching to, ugh, Linux.) > > There's this thing called NetBSD... And FreeBSD will probably be running on the ALPHA sooner than you know it. There is already significant interest (and some monetary backing) for this to happen now. Jordan