From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 17 21:20:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6175A1065670; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 21:20:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCD88FC1B; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 21:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iadj38 with SMTP id j38so3414978iad.13 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 13:20:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4vUDdwQDffP/qjDVonCsMYVaBsQ2sgUR8jcGy6ehRXg=; b=I8S4/FHGkrM0Oij3ohhQRckhFcHZNmUBtmI9esXyjDIN7jv4nXGxruYmGH1AMOsc83 +1yqes6/FXonW9YRjvo9mwO5vl2j3FRe16ot1kWCcWZKsZQvahriRrxxuH+OI4yup8r6 O2zuPEgnlPC1KrnEmmGgnYBOlRzauzkEZF0t8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.186.200 with SMTP id fm8mr17217739igc.93.1324156845457; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 13:20:45 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.243.65 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 13:20:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EED05EC.8050103@FreeBSD.org> References: <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com> <4EE2AE64.9060802@m5p.com> <4EE88343.2050302@m5p.com> <4EE933C6.4020209@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4EECD261.2080208@m5p.com> <4EED05EC.8050103@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 13:20:45 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: e4a9Kg0YMq-bNc3EyQkPsxKCCuE Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Andriy Gapon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: George Mitchell , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Oliver Pinter Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 21:20:46 -0000 Erm, just as a random question - since device drivers (and GEOM) run as separate threads, has anyone looked into what kind of effects the scheduler has on these? I definitely have measurable throughput/responsiveness differences between ULE and 4BSD (and preempt/non-preempt on 4BSD) on my MIPS boards when they're bridging traffic. I wonder if there's something strange going on with the scheduling and preemption of driver netisrs, taskqueues, the fast interrupt handlers, etc. This may -not- be a userland specific problem.. Adrian