From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Oct 8 13: 4:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224A537B401 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cactus.fi.uba.ar (cactus.fi.uba.ar [157.92.49.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C263243E4A for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:04:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fgleiser@cactus.fi.uba.ar) Received: from cactus.fi.uba.ar (cactus.fi.uba.ar [157.92.49.108]) by cactus.fi.uba.ar (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g98K2CAO017380; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 17:02:12 -0300 (ART) (envelope-from fgleiser@cactus.fi.uba.ar) Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 17:02:12 -0300 (ART) From: Fernando Gleiser To: ksrgyn - Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Messages in the dmesg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20021008165934.T3949-100000@cactus.fi.uba.ar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,WEIRD_PORT version=2.31 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, ksrgyn - wrote: > xl0: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > options=3D3 > inet 200.x.x.72 netmask 0xffffffc0 broadcast 200.x.x.127 > inet 200.x.x.90 netmask 0xffffffc0 broadcast 200.x.x.127 > inet 200.x.x.91 netmask 0xffffffc0 broadcast 200.x.x.127 > ether 00:10:4b:c5:2e:1c > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > > xl1: flags=3D8843 mtu 1500 > inet 200.y.y.132 netmask 0xfffffc0 broadcast 200.y.y.191 > ether 00:60:97:dd:f0:b8 > media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP ) > > arp: 200.y.y.130 is on xl1 but got reply from 00:b0:64:08:36:60 on xl0 > arp: 200.x.x.72 is on lo0 but got reply from 00:10:4b:c5:2e:1c on xl1 > > What's the problem ?? It means just that: and arp reply for some address in the 200.y.y.0 subnet (xl1 subnet) arrived on xl1 and vice-versa. Are both NICs connected to the same physical LAN, by chance? =09=09=09Fer > > _________________________________________________________________ > Converse com seus amigos online, fa=E7a o download gr=E1tis do MSN Messen= ger: > http://messenger.msn.com.br > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message