From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 17 16:44:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B8416A41C; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:44:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from plouf.absolight.net (plouf.absolight.net [193.30.224.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF00143D49; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:44:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pouet.in.mat.cc (pouet.in.mat.cc [193.30.224.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by plouf.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76AF8A2403A; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:44:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:44:06 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Kris Kennaway , Sergey Skvortsov Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20050617150141.GA25245@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200506171316.j5HDGYPK027087@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050617150141.GA25245@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.0 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: mat@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/p5-Net-SDP pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:44:11 -0000 +-Le 17/06/2005 11:01 -0400, Kris Kennaway a dit : | On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 01:16:34PM +0000, Sergey Skvortsov wrote: |> skv 2005-06-17 13:16:34 UTC |> |> FreeBSD ports repository |> |> Modified files: |> net/p5-Net-SDP pkg-plist |> Log: |> Fix .packlist | | I think this is supposed to be fixed by a bsd.port.mk patch that I | tested for mat several weeks ago. Mat, what's the status of | committing that patch? Oh, it's been ready to commit since I broke all those other ports last time. Do I have to do it myself ? -- Mathieu Arnold