From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Feb 21 23:55:44 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA27790 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 21 Feb 1997 23:55:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA27785 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 1997 23:55:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id XAA00883; Fri, 21 Feb 1997 23:55:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 23:55:24 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White X-Sender: dwhite@localhost Reply-To: Doug White To: Snob Art Genre cc: Cliff Addy , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: newer pine? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 21 Feb 1997, Snob Art Genre wrote: > > 3.95 will compile file if you specify the 'netbsd' target. The mouse > > stuff will complain but it doesn't work too well anyway -- you would be > > the better to disable it. This box is actually using 3.94 without any > > major problems, and our master mail server is on 3.95 with likewise, no > > probs to report. > > Do you know if it shipped with 2.1.7? Assuming the ftp site is the current state of affairs, there is a ports-2.1.7 -> ports-2.1.6 symlink in place which I would assume means that there will be no updated ports for 2.1.7. This is naturally an assumption and should be taken with a large container of salt handy. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major