From owner-freebsd-i18n  Fri May 18 20:12: 6 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-i18n@freebsd.org
Received: from sraigw.sra.co.jp (sraigw.sra.co.jp [202.32.10.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DE20137B43C; Fri, 18 May 2001 20:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from soda@sra.co.jp)
Received: from sranhf.sra.co.jp (sranhf [133.137.28.3])
	by sraigw.sra.co.jp (8.8.7/3.7W-sraigw) with ESMTP id MAA18444;
	Sat, 19 May 2001 12:11:57 +0900 (JST)
Received: from srapc342.sra.co.jp (root@srapc342 [133.137.28.111])
	by sranhf.sra.co.jp (8.8.7/3.6Wbeta7-srambox) with ESMTP id MAA02089;
	Sat, 19 May 2001 12:11:56 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from soda@localhost) by srapc342.sra.co.jp (8.8.8/3.4W-sra) id MAA00879; Sat, 19 May 2001 12:11:56 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 12:11:56 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <200105190311.MAA00879@srapc342.sra.co.jp>
From: Noriyuki Soda <soda@sra.co.jp>
To: i18n@freebsd.org, audit@freebsd.org
Cc: bsd-locale@hauN.org
Subject: Re: CFR: ISO_* -> ISO-* locale renaming
In-Reply-To: <20010519104728.A8118@cartier.cirx.org>
References: <20010518203702.B79058@nagual.pp.ru>
	<20010518205242.A79407@nagual.pp.ru>
	<20010519010920.A2911@cartier.cirx.org>
	<200105182300.IAA29954@srapc342.sra.co.jp>
	<20010519104728.A8118@cartier.cirx.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-i18n@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-i18n.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-i18n>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-i18n>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>>>>> On Sat, 19 May 2001 11:48:08 +0900, Clive Lin <clive@tongi.org> said:

>> > Just zh_CN.EUC -> zh_CN.GB2312 would be fine.
>> >
>> > They (almost) mean the same thing, but in different names.
>> 
>> How about zh_TW.eucTW then?
>> (zh_TW.eucTW is supported by both X11 and citrus).

> do I misunderstand you ? zh_CN.EUC and zh_TW.eucTW are different.

Yes, I know that. That's why they should have different codeset
names. i.e. "eucCN" and "eucTW" (as already supported X11 primary
codeset name).

My point is that there is no MIME charset name definition for eucTW 
in IANA registry. And Linux implementation (at least Redhat 6.1)
produces incorrect result for eucTW.
In other words, one of examples that IANA doesn't work, and X11 works.
-- 
soda

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-i18n" in the body of the message