From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Feb 25 04:33:47 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA85B1065673;
	Sat, 25 Feb 2012 04:33:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from 172-17-197-151.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43BAD1568E8;
	Sat, 25 Feb 2012 04:33:45 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4F4864A8.1030505@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:33:44 -0800
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120224 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl>
References: <1330106215702-5513504.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <1330106215702-5513504.post@n5.nabble.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, miwi@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: updating mksh, portmaster -a, pkg_version strangeness
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 04:33:48 -0000

On 02/24/2012 09:56, Jakub Lach wrote:
> Hello, 
> 
> It looks like 'portmaster -a' was not picking 
> up mksh update since mksh-r40 here, it
> piqued my curiosity when pkg_version
> reported I had newer mksh installed than
> available in ports tree, but the version I had 
> installed was ripe old mksh-r40.
> 
> Now, after 'portmaster mksh' and apparently 
> 'Upgrade of mksh-r40 to mksh-r40.d 
> completed' could somebody explain that?

The DISTVERSION is incorrectly specified:

pkg_version -t R40 R40d
>


-- 

	It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/