From owner-cvs-all Fri Nov 16 1:51:21 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB4737B418; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 01:51:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA05805; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 20:51:10 +1100 Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 20:49:56 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: To: John Baldwin Cc: , Subject: RE: cvs commit: src/release/alpha fixit_crunch.conf src/release/ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20011116202627.X25527-100000@delplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, John Baldwin wrote: > On 14-Nov-01 John Baldwin wrote: > > ... > > Log: > > The new libedit from a while back depends on ncurses, so put -ledit before > > -lncurses so the fixit crunch binary links. > > ... > > Ok, head scratching time. My test x86 release did finish fine w/o this, so it > seems only alpha needs this. FWIW, it seems that libedit just needs libtermcap > judging by other lines in the release output, so I could change this to just > put -ledit instead of -ltermcap if desired. libtermcap is (bogusly) just a link to libncurses, so using the wrong one works too well and it's hard to tell whether the superset one (libncurses) is required. > Anyone know why the alpha version > would fail to link but x86 would work fine? Both are current from just a few > days ago. Also, fwiw, the boot crunch has libedit very early and links with > libncurses but not with libtermcap. I don't know, but guess it is just due to a slightly different set of binaries in the alpha version (mainly ee instead of vi). Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message