From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 18 23:10:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5316C1065673 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD878FC1A for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n1INA2XI068806 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:10:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n1INA2nP068805; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:10:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:10:02 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <200902182310.n1INA2nP068805@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Pete French Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400231065673 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:03:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from constantine.ticketswitch.com (constantine.ticketswitch.com [IPv6:2002:57e0:1d4e:1::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023128FC18 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:03:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from dilbert.rattatosk ([10.64.50.6] helo=dilbert.ticketswitch.com) by constantine.ticketswitch.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LZvRn-00051f-AH for FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:03:19 +0000 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ticketswitch.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LZvRn-000As2-97 for FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:03:19 +0000 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:03:19 +0000 From: Pete French To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113 Cc: Subject: bin/131861: /usr/bin/mail misses addresses when replying to all X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pete French List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:10:02 -0000 >Number: 131861 >Category: bin >Synopsis: /usr/bin/mail misses addresses when replying to all >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Wed Feb 18 23:10:01 UTC 2009 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Pete French >Release: FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE amd64 >Organization: >Environment: System: FreeBSD dilbert.rattatosk 7.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Jan 5 13:02:14 GMT 2009 petefrench@constantine.rattatosk:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 >Description: The 'R' command is supposed to reply to all recipients, but it gets confused when the mail header does not have a space after the comma separating the names. For example a mail like this: From: "Matthew Taylor" To: "David Gilbert" ,"Pete French" ,"Peter Robinson" CC: "Chris Martini" ,"Jason McLaughlin" when I hit 'R' only goes to addresses like this: To: peterrobinson@ticketswitch.com Matt@seatem.com Cc: jasonmclaughlin@ticketswitch.com If, however, I edit the original to include spaces, so it looks like this: From: "Matthew Taylor" To: "David Gilbert" , "Pete French" , "Peter Robinson" CC: "Chris Martini" , "Jason McLaughlin" Then reply now works properly, like this... To: davidgilbert@ticketswitch.com peterrobinson@ticketswitch.com Matt@seatem.com Cc: chrismartini@ticketswitch.com jasonmclaughlin@ticketswitch.com The mails with ," instead of , " appear to be generated by Microsoft email software, and I have not checked to see if they are RFC compliant. But they are out there live, and are the cause of much annoyance when replying to mail. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: