From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Sep 14 09:25:55 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA21916 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 14 Sep 1996 09:25:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from super-g.inch.com (spork@super-g.com [204.178.32.161]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA21908 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 1996 09:25:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (spork@localhost) by super-g.inch.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA05698; Sat, 14 Sep 1996 10:25:16 -0500 Date: Sat, 14 Sep 1996 10:25:16 -0500 (CDT) From: "S(pork)" X-Sender: spork@super-g.inch.com To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Package install 2.1.5, proc: table is full In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Yeah, it's pretty interesting, when I go to the other console and do a ps -ax (ps -aux segmentation faults) I see about 80 zombie tar processes... What else in the install hasn't been completed, and how safe do you think it is to just reboot right now? Also, is there a log that notes the packages and the order they were installed upt to this point? Thanks, Charles On Fri, 13 Sep 1996, Doug White wrote: > On Fri, 13 Sep 1996, S(pork) wrote: > > > I swear I've seen the answer to this before, but I just checked the FAQ > > and searched the archive and I can't find it... Basically about 2/3 of > > the way through the package install, it fails, and I see the above message > > (proc: table is full) in the debug screen. > > > > I'd call it a bug and install the packages once the system is installed. > (use pkg_add to install packages.) > > Doug White | University of Oregon > Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant > http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major >