From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 10 09:24:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9731065676 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:24:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tamaru@myn.rcast.u-tokyo.ac.jp) Received: from mail0.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (mail0.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.45.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561558FC1A for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:24:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tamaru@myn.rcast.u-tokyo.ac.jp) Received: from mhs001.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (mhs001.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.70.161]) by mail0.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530591BE800C for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:24:25 +0900 (JST) Received: from amulet.amuletic.net (124.155.55.252 [124.155.55.252]) by mhs001.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (SpamBlock.pstn.b 3.4.102) with ESMTP id for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:24:19 +0900 Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:24:19 +0900 Message-ID: From: Hiroharu Tamaru To: John Baldwin In-Reply-To: <200903091001.58631.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200812091720.mB9HK1uY021743@freefall.freebsd.org> <200903021353.21920.jhb@freebsd.org> <200903091001.58631.jhb@freebsd.org> User-Agent: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-IP: 124.155.55.252 X-FROM-DOMAIN: myn.rcast.u-tokyo.ac.jp X-FROM-EMAIL: tamaru@myn.rcast.u-tokyo.ac.jp Cc: sobomax@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, pjd@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/129526: pxeboot fails to load kernel / modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:24:26 -0000 At Mon, 9 Mar 2009 10:01:58 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Saturday 07 March 2009 1:01:05 pm Hiroharu Tamaru wrote: > > > > It sure helps the default pxeboot, so for me it is much > > better if this is commited, but what would you say? > > Ok, I will commit it. It seems more than just GPT bloated the size too much. > I'm not sure what that could be though. Thanks for the commit. It will help our setup very much. I'll be waiting for the MFC (which I noticed in the commit message) as well. By the way, I hope this won't annoy people with small embedded machines though. I mean, could it influence loader (not the PXE one but the one used for disk boot) behavior on a small system with small memory, now that the heap is at a higher place by default? Probably, it won't matter, since those people should be tuning a whole lot of things to make it work in the first place? Anyway, thanks a lot. Hiroharu Tamaru