From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 29 01:21:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC4516A41F; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:21:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (nagual.pp.ru [194.87.13.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12EBF43D55; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:21:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jAT1L5ke084151; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 04:21:05 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jAT1L3nb084150; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 04:21:03 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 04:21:03 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov To: Bruce Evans Message-ID: <20051129012102.GA84108@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Bruce Evans , Steve Kargl , Andre Oppermann , Bruce Evans , cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200511280832.jAS8WGvs059057@repoman.freebsd.org> <438AD8FB.A8B96AB6@freebsd.org> <20051128172718.GA59929@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20051129110058.T33820@delplex.bde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051129110058.T33820@delplex.bde.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, Andre Oppermann , cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, Bruce Evans , Steve Kargl Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/msun/src e_lgammaf_r.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:21:08 -0000 On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 11:49:13AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > I don't like writing papers, and rarely read them these days. Not writting the paper about your libm changes will increase chances your changes will be simple lost at some step. Possible scenario: 1) One of other *BSD totally rewrite its libm using some outside source, many new latest standard conforming functions added. 2) Although it is not so good in many aspects as yours, users will demand switching, since knows not at all about your goal/efforts/ulps/etc. 3) Someday someone switch from obsoleted N-years old etc. libm to be compatible with the rest of *BSD. BTW, do you optimize Athlon only calculation? What about Intel EM64? -- http://ache.pp.ru/