From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 31 12:05:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224A51065678 for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 12:05:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from raven.customer.vol.cz (raven.customer.vol.cz [195.250.144.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79328FC1A for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 12:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pav.hide.vol.cz (nat-application.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz [195.122.204.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by raven.customer.vol.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4VC57f4021025 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 14:05:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4C03A5F3.60208@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 14:05:07 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100525 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20100531114617.GE20695@mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw> In-Reply-To: <20100531114617.GE20695@mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 195.250.144.108 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: raven.customer.vol.cz; Sender-ip: 195.122.204.152; Sender-helo: pav.hide.vol.cz; ) Cc: Subject: Re: Wrong lib version in UPDATING for devel/gettext X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 12:05:12 -0000 On 2010/05/31 13:46, Denny Lin wrote: > Hi, I just upgraded to gettext 0.18, and I noticed that the entry in > UPDATING seems to document the wrong version numbers: > (from intl.7 to intl.8) > should be > (from intl.8 to intl.9) > > $ grep 'intl\.so' devel/gettext/pkg-plist > lib/libintl.so > lib/libintl.so.9 > You're totally correct. I have just fixed the entry. -- Pav Lucistnik