From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 27 10:23:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: perl@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267AD1065675; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:23:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42AE13C458; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:23:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306C72095; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:23:10 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,URIBL_OB_SURBL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.8/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E4B2091; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:23:09 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: "Yen-Ming Lee" References: <86zltpzrxt.fsf@ds4.des.no> <759236930802242324o614598d1i1a8ca3cc8c12478c@mail.gmail.com> <86prulibf4.fsf@ds4.des.no> <759236930802250245j646f5be5k8382bedbfb2a7c1e@mail.gmail.com> <868x19i6ky.fsf@ds4.des.no> <759236930802251702h694c4f5bn2c7c87c7c47c7cc@mail.gmail.com> <86zltnsxap.fsf@ds4.des.no> <759236930802261046h216da59fv2bfdd616f601c325@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:23:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <759236930802261046h216da59fv2bfdd616f601c325@mail.gmail.com> (Yen-Ming Lee's message of "Tue\, 26 Feb 2008 10\:46\:35 -0800") Message-ID: <86ablmr94j.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ports@freebsd.org, perl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port dependencies on p5-Test-* X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:23:23 -0000 > And I guess that you prefer to keep RUN_DEPENDS simple, and even > ignore BUILD_DEPENDS at all. The users will get some warning messages > for missing dependencies but it builds anyway. However, It means that > the port maintainers need to somehow find out that which dependencies > are really needed based on the modules installed, not the > not-really-useful Makefile.PL or Build.PL, since the module authors > may put everything there no matter they are really needed or needed > for tests. Thank you for showing that you neither understand the issue nor have any interest in fixing it. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no