From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 28 11:49:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2864716A4CE; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 11:49:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from gewurtztraminer.cng.fr (gewurtztraminer.cng.fr [193.50.0.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44F243D41; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 11:49:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from heath@cng.fr) Received: from gewurtztraminer.cng.fr (gewurtztraminer.cng.fr [127.0.0.1]) hBSJnpA6014439; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 20:49:51 +0100 Received: (from apache@localhost) by gewurtztraminer.cng.fr (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hBSJnoHe014434; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 20:49:50 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: gewurtztraminer.cng.fr: apache set sender to heath@cng.fr using -f Received: from atuileries-111-1-3-114.w81-48.abo.wanadoo.fr (atuileries-111-1-3-114.w81-48.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.48.99.114]) by webmail.cng.fr (IMP) with HTTP for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 20:49:50 +0100 Message-ID: <1072640990.3fef33deb5d1f@webmail.cng.fr> Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 20:49:50 +0100 From: heath@cng.fr To: Harald Schmalzbauer References: <200312281800.37535@harrymail> <200312281956.18129@harrymail> <3FEF2B09.7050902@freebsd.org> <200312282044.27519@harrymail> In-Reply-To: <200312282044.27519@harrymail> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.1 X-Originating-IP: 81.48.99.114 cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2RC heavily crashed by kaudiokreator X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 19:49:55 -0000 Quoting Harald Schmalzbauer : > On Sunday 28 December 2003 20:12, Scott Long wrote: > *SNIP* > > >>>This is likely related to a problem in the GEOM layer that was fixed in > > >>>5.2-CURRENT a few days ago. Would you be able to upgrade your sources > > >>>and try your test again? I'd like to get some more confirmation that > > >> > > >>Of course I do so. Is it enough to just change this one file or this one > > >>plus some others or should I go -current? > > > > > > Ok, I hate replying myself, but after a bit of thinking I'm quiet sure I > > > have to go -current since the file tree has changed. Am I right? > > > > > > -Harry > > > > No, the file tree hasn't changed. You can probably get away with just > > updating sys/geom/geom_event.c. However, I make no guarantees, so keep > > a backup kernel handy =-) > > Ok, it doesn't compile. Regrettably I'm no hacker so I have to have a lucky > hand to find the missing/changed header/whatever. > Perhaps somebody can answer this much quicker (phk?) > > /usr/src/sys/geom/geom_event.c: In function `g_orphan_provider': > /usr/src/sys/geom/geom_event.c:114: error: `G_PF_ORPHAN' undeclared (first > use > in this function) > /usr/src/sys/geom/geom_event.c:114: error: (Each undeclared identifier is > reported only once > /usr/src/sys/geom/geom_event.c:114: error: for each function it appears in.) > *** Error code 1 > You'll need to update sys/geom/geom.h as well to get the definition for G_PF_ORPHAN Simon