From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 10:32:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E21616A4CE for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:32:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.willystudios.com (mail2.willystudios.com [65.39.221.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36A543D31 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:32:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stucchi@willystudios.com) Received: from mail.willystudios.com (unknown [81.208.60.193]) by mail2.willystudios.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45CD6D9DD for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:31:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from vekkio.willystudios.com (host44-22.pool80182.interbusiness.it [80.182.22.44]) by mail.willystudios.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 759915F for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:37:41 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:32:15 +0100 From: Massimiliano Stucchi To: questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040106193215.567b08c0@vekkio.willystudios.com> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: WillyStudios.com, LTD X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__6_Jan_2004_19_32_15_+0100_=uprwJ1g5i1GNvN0" Subject: Re: why does inetd default to enable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 18:32:02 -0000 --Signature=_Tue__6_Jan_2004_19_32_15_+0100_=uprwJ1g5i1GNvN0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:57:12 -0500 "fbsd_user" wrote: > The 4.9 /etc/defaults/rc.conf file has inetd_enable="YES" > > Why is that? That's normal behaviour. Inetd is active, but nothing is enabled by default. > During the sysinstall I answered NO to inetd question. You answered no to a question asking you if you wanted to customize inetd's behaviour, not if ou wanted to enable it. > Is this not an error? nope. Cheers -- Stucchi Massimiliano | Gruppo Utenti FreeBSD Italia WillyStudios.com | http://www.gufi.org stucchi@willystudios.com | max@gufi.org "People who make no mistakes do not usually make anything" --Signature=_Tue__6_Jan_2004_19_32_15_+0100_=uprwJ1g5i1GNvN0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/+v8wFwcpJfdZDoERAhoxAJ9vUMEJYIzJPYM7ml1q6TtvYJMxtACZAUC/ 6fr0hG9Zms/PxJh8A2R2IwE= =2VTM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__6_Jan_2004_19_32_15_+0100_=uprwJ1g5i1GNvN0--