From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 26 16:23:49 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC390106568B
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 May 2009 16:23:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kostjn@peterhost.ru)
Received: from mail.z8.ru (mail.z8.ru [80.93.58.56])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F108FC24
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 May 2009 16:23:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kostjn@peterhost.ru)
Received: from [85.235.196.139] (helo=kostjn.pht)
	by mail.z8.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <kostjn@peterhost.ru>) id 1M8zRI-000A3k-C5
	for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 20:23:44 +0400
Message-ID: <4A1C1805.8070906@peterhost.ru>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 20:25:41 +0400
From: Menshikov Konstantin <kostjn@peterhost.ru>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20090328)
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
References: <4A1B8CF8.7030102@peterhost.ru> <gvgqrt$g5d$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <gvgqrt$g5d$1@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Disk quota for Jail. Discussion.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:23:50 -0000

Ivan Voras wrote:
> Menshikov Konstantin wrote:
>   
>> Hi.
>> Jail now have no disk quotas.
>> Users which use jail, use separate zfs or md device for jail, but it
>> from a hopelessness.
>>     
>
> Well, the ZFS way of doing things (per-filesystem quotas) is actually
> the right way to do it - it solves exactly the problem described.
>
>
>   
Yes, you are right.
But this way, has some lacks.
1. For quota change jail, it is necessary to stop jail and to start 
procedure of change of the size of file system. In case of use ufs it is 
not simple.
2. In case of use zfs, as far as I know, it is impossible to use virtual 
file systems for example unionfs.