Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 21:19:22 -0400 From: "Lanny Baron" <lnb@FreeBSDsystems.com> To: "'J.Goodleaf'" <john@goodleaf.net>, <stable@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Benchmarks from SysAdmin mag Message-ID: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA2489yS0J80eLWJIQHR8vg8KAAAAQAAAAQ0vdBwIm/0iTFAwl73VpPwEAAAAA@FreeBSDsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <20010708012209.E37CE5C69@clyde.goodleaf.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, It looks very biased but looking at some of the words quickly. They say one thing and do another. Namely; "The operating systems were the latest version available from a commercial distribution and were not recompiled (i.e., everything was tested right out of the box)." " On the UNIX-style operating systems, it was necessary to tweak the kernel slightly to allow the use of so many connections in one process. " So the right and left hands no knot each other. --lanny -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG] On Behalf Of J.Goodleaf Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 9:22 PM To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Benchmarks from SysAdmin mag I lack the technical expertise to judge this article fully. Any thoughts? FreeBSD comes out at the bottom, _below_ Win2K. http://www.samag.com/articles/2001/0107/0107a/0107a.htm -John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA2489yS0J80eLWJIQHR8vg8KAAAAQAAAAQ0vdBwIm/0iTFAwl73VpPwEAAAAA>