Date: Thu, 28 Nov 1996 12:45:17 -0800 From: Tim Baird <tim@print.gfmurray.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tcp/ip on ethernet problem Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19961128204517.0069c948@print.gfmurray.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:46 PM 11/27/96 -0500, you wrote: >>Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 23:44:55 -0500 >>To: Tim Baird <tim@print.gfmurray.com> >>From: Guy Silliman <mgpr@ptd.net> >>Subject: Re: tcp/ip on ethernet problem >> >>At 03:53 PM 11/27/96 -0800, you wrote: >> >>>NT box? When you say that it "works fine", what do you mean? Are referring >>>to the TCP/IP performance between the NT box and the gateway, or are you >>>talking about other protocols used between hosts connected via the same hub >>>(ie. IPX/SPX, NetBEUI) >>> >>>If you are talking about other protocols -- say IPX, the windowing >>>capability of IPX is much more forgiving in a 1/2 duplex situation... >>> >>>What about the TCP/IP performance between the NT box and the FBSD box? >>> >> >> I am talkin pure tcp/ip stuff...the nt box can access the internet >through the gate without any trouble... it is to be a proxy server once it >is all set up, but for now it is just a machine sitting there. If I ping >the .254 gate from the nt box I get immediate and consistant replies. What is the ping/ftp/whatever performance between the NT box and the FBSD box? Are you able to swap the ethernet cards between these two boxes and compare? >> >>Guy >> > > > Tim Baird Dominus Fecit "The Lord Made" Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of my employer etc. etc
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1.5.4.32.19961128204517.0069c948>