Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:20:27 -0600 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@FreeBSD.org> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ulrich_Sp=F6rlein?= <uqs@freebsd.org> Cc: scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please review patch for aic7xxx_pci.c Message-ID: <1A005A2E-6DD4-4D3D-AD5B-2C8BD167EB03@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20130723222939.GH9030@acme.spoerlein.net> References: <20130716094927.GA9030@acme.spoerlein.net> <20130723071129.GD9030@acme.spoerlein.net> <FBF11F26-4083-4F7C-AEC6-054E369A1A25@FreeBSD.org> <20130723204530.GE9030@acme.spoerlein.net> <86E509ED-694D-49B0-A3D9-C9C7B71F67CE@FreeBSD.org> <20130723214126.GG9030@acme.spoerlein.net> <DB1AD5E3-8108-46EF-AEC0-195AEEF7FCEC@FreeBSD.org> <20130723222939.GH9030@acme.spoerlein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 23, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Ulrich Sp=F6rlein <uqs@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 16:04:04 -0600, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: >> On Jul 23, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Ulrich Sp=F6rlein <uqs@freebsd.org> = wrote: >>=20 >>> On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 15:15:53 -0600, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: >>>> On Jul 23, 2013, at 2:45 PM, Ulrich Sp=F6rlein <uqs@freebsd.org> = wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> Thanks, but maybe it's better to have the discussion here. >>>>>=20 >>>>> You wrote: >>>>> The difference in the argument order between the declaration and = definition is >>>>> likely what led to this programming error. Your patch should also = correct the >>>>> argument reversal in the declaration of = ahc_9005_subdevinfo_valid(). >>>>>=20 >>>>> The argument order you've used seems the best choice since it = matches what is >>>>> used in ahc_compose_id(). >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> I'm not sure that reversing the arguments in the function = definition is >>>>> the right way. This would make the patch a no-op. >>>>=20 >>>> Read the quote again. I said change the "declaration", not the >>>> "definition". To be extremely clear, the code currently looks like >>>> this: >>>=20 >>> D'oh, that's what I get for reading too fast. I've opted to change = the >>> function definition, in the end, so that declaration, definition and >>> call-site are in sync, see >>> = https://github.com/uqs/freebsd-head/commit/e699b2fde01f235a22e1125e9f3aef1= 6623b512f >>>=20 >>> Thanks! >>> Uli >>=20 >> But now the order of the arguments does not match ahc_compose_id(). >>=20 >> It seems to me that we want to only have a single convention in how = this >> data is passed to functions. >=20 > Ok, back to the first variant then. Works for me. -- Justin=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1A005A2E-6DD4-4D3D-AD5B-2C8BD167EB03>