Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:31:06 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Daniel Eriksson <daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com> Cc: 'FreeBSD Current' <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Multiple choices for RAID-0, best performance? Message-ID: <20040624123106.GC12007@darkness.comp.waw.pl> In-Reply-To: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1PdsKAAAAQAAAArboJgGwHU0apkIeCcojdKwEAAAAA@telia.com> References: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1PdsKAAAAQAAAArboJgGwHU0apkIeCcojdKwEAAAAA@telia.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--U7F39clxgs+06sAz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:22:39PM +0200, Daniel Eriksson wrote: +>=20 +> (previously posted on -questions without any replies) +>=20 +> With the recent addition of a geom-enabled vinum, and the discussed (but= not +> yet functional?) geom stripe module, we now have 4 different choices for +> software RAID-0 on ATA devices (the other two are regular vinum and +> ataraid). GEOM_STRIPE class is fully functional. I only compared it with ccd(4) and it (GEOM_STRIPE) is faster than ccd. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.FreeBSD.org pjd@FreeBSD.org http://garage.freebsd.pl FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --U7F39clxgs+06sAz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA2smKForvXbEpPzQRAo6FAKDoaKpltV9upbIM6FM98ezGXBCI/ACdEuFK ekqOjNrWDlJKGgnRo4714Ds= =MJTv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --U7F39clxgs+06sAz--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040624123106.GC12007>