Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:25:57 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: Alexandre DELAY <alexandre.delay@free.fr> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange dummynet WFQ problem Message-ID: <20051120132556.A47536@xorpc.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <MAEBLPAGHGPMOKCBICBNOENHCIAA.alexandre.delay@free.fr>; from alexandre.delay@free.fr on Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:16:40PM %2B0100 References: <20051120101001.A45777@xorpc.icir.org> <MAEBLPAGHGPMOKCBICBNOENHCIAA.alexandre.delay@free.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:16:40PM +0100, Alexandre DELAY wrote: > Interresting. I didn't find anythong about that. > Where can I learn more about this "priorities"? well, dummynet does not du priorities but weights. lookup google for "WFQ" or read the ipfw manpage. cheers luigi > Alex > > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Luigi Rizzo [mailto:rizzo@icir.org] > Envoye : dimanche 20 novembre 2005 19:10 > A : Alexandre DELAY > Cc : freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org > Objet : Re: strange dummynet WFQ problem > > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:04:47PM +0100, Alexandre DELAY wrote: > > It effectively works well, but I still have a problem: > > > > When I use my bandwidth (download a huge file) and I start a ping at the > > same time, latency grows from 15ms up to 300ms. > > it is normal because the ping packets are queued behind > the other traffic. > > luigi > > > Again my conf: > > > > > 00005 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > > > 00006 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > > > 00007 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > > > 00011 divert 8668 ip from any to any via ext > > > 21046 queue 8 ip from any to 172.20.1.23 in via ext > > > 21047 queue 9 ip from 172.20.1.23 to any in via int > > > 65535 allow ip from any to any > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Alex > > > > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org]De la part de Luigi Rizzo > > Envoye : mercredi 29 juin 2005 18:33 > > A : Alexandre D. > > Cc : freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org > > Objet : Re: strange dummynet WFQ problem > > > > > > hi, > > when a pipe or queue has a mask of all 0's it only shows the addresses of > > the first packet that matched, so you don't have to worry about that. > > Also, if queues are linked to the pipe, the accounting is done on > > the queues and not on the pipe. > > > > cheers > > luigi > > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 06:27:48PM +0200, Alexandre D. wrote: > > > > > > Hi guys > > > > > > I have a strange problem. > > > > > > here is a simple sample my conf (hic!): > > > > > > # ipfw list > > > 00005 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > > > 00006 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > > > 00007 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > > > 00011 divert 8668 ip from any to any via ext > > > 21046 queue 8 ip from any to 172.20.1.23 > > > 21047 queue 9 ip from 172.20.1.23 to any > > > 65535 allow ip from any to any > > > > > > bash-2.05b# ipfw pipe list > > > 00001: 1.024 Mbit/s 0 ms 50 sl. 0 queues (1 buckets) droptail > > > mask: 0x00 0x00000000/0x0000 -> 0x00000000/0x0000 > > > 00002: 1.024 Mbit/s 0 ms 50 sl. 0 queues (1 buckets) droptail > > > mask: 0x00 0x00000000/0x0000 -> 0x00000000/0x0000 > > > ... > > > q00008: weight 4 pipe 1 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail > > > mask: 0x00 0x00000000/0x0000 -> 0x00000000/0x0000 > > > BKT Prot ___Source IP/port____ ____Dest. IP/port____ Tot_pkt/bytes > > Pkt/Byte > > > Drp > > > 0 udp dns address/53 172.20.1.195/3007 1032 254524 0 > > 0 > > > 0 > > > q00009: weight 4 pipe 2 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail > > > mask: 0x00 0x00000000/0x0000 -> 0x00000000/0x0000 > > > BKT Prot ___Source IP/port____ ____Dest. IP/port____ Tot_pkt/bytes > > Pkt/Byte > > > Drp > > > 0 udp 172.20.1.195/68 255.255.255.255/67 589 53330 0 > 0 > > > 0 > > > > > > > > > The thing is that: > > > -it looks that datas are going through the corrects queues, > > > -each queue is correctly linked to a pipe > > > -there is not accounting on both pipes > > > -only dns packets are shown by this command. > > > > > > > > > My wonders are: > > > -How can I be sure that my queues are correctly linked to the pipes? > > > -Why don't I have accounting on the pipes? > > > -Why don't I get other than dns packet accounting? > > > > > > Sorry for the english > > > > > > Thanks for the answer > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051120132556.A47536>