Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:56:00 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: AT Matik <asstec@matik.com.br> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange dummynet WFQ problem Message-ID: <20051120135600.C47585@xorpc.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <200511201940.01686.asstec@matik.com.br>; from asstec@matik.com.br on Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:40:01PM -0200 References: <20051120101001.A45777@xorpc.icir.org> <MAEBLPAGHGPMOKCBICBNOENHCIAA.alexandre.delay@free.fr> <20051120132556.A47536@xorpc.icir.org> <200511201940.01686.asstec@matik.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:40:01PM -0200, AT Matik wrote: > On Sunday 20 November 2005 19:25, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 07:16:40PM +0100, Alexandre DELAY wrote: > > > Interresting. I didn't find anythong about that. > > > Where can I learn more about this "priorities"? > > > > well, dummynet does not du priorities but weights. > > lookup google for "WFQ" > > or read the ipfw manpage. > > > > ehh, I guess he wanted to know why icmp echo is beeing queued because you said > it before because that's what is written in his ruleset. (at list i suppose - he did not sent "ipfw queue show" output but from his previous example he did not put masks on the queues).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051120135600.C47585>