Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:54:41 +0200 From: Nikola Lecic <nlecic@EUnet.yu> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: Latitude <robertjx@ix.netcom.com>, Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Convince me, please! Message-ID: <200708091459.l79ExbIU016932@smtpclu-5.eunet.yu> In-Reply-To: <20070809151022.Y69393@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <46BA9682.7020203@ix.netcom.com> <20070809082612.b990026e.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20070809151022.Y69393@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 15:11:06 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > > a "perfectly acceptable alternative for home desktop users who have > > previously known only Windows." It's not, and it never will be. >=20 > never say never, but i wish too it will never be. Please note that the original posting contains a hidden claim that window$ is a perfect, eternal and god-given desktop system. Therefore if you say that FreeBSD will never be a "perfectly acceptable alternative..." to that, you agree with that hidden claim. window$ as a desktop system is as wrong as it is as an "operating system". In my opinion, FreeBSD set up as a desktop system is what a desktop system should be, so FreeBSD with GUI apps _is_ -- or can be if you want -- a "perfect desktop system".=20 Or: "perfect desktop system" has nothing to do with m$'s approach. To Latitude: if you can't accept this ^^^, then don't switch. Nikola Le=C4=8Di=C4=87
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200708091459.l79ExbIU016932>