Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:38:43 +0200 From: "Heiko Wundram (Beenic)" <wundram@beenic.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X + WM != GUI? (Re: Convince me, please! - too much about "GUI") Message-ID: <200708101138.43372.wundram@beenic.net> In-Reply-To: <46bc2882.TI%2BZ9rtlEFmBGJQV%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <46BA9682.7020203@ix.netcom.com> <20070809185814.D71656@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <46bc2882.TI%2BZ9rtlEFmBGJQV%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am Freitag 10 August 2007 10:57:38 schrieb perryh@pluto.rain.com: > Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > > i don't use GUI. it takes a lot and gives nothing. i use both text > > and graphic (X) based apps and no gui. i use fvwm2 with my config, > > there are plenty of nice other wm's good for that. > > I am not following this. If (X.org + some WM) is not a GUI, > how would you define He probably equates a desktop environment (such as KDE/Gnome/etc.) to a GUI. Which is wrong, of course: GUI is just any form of "graphical user interface", which X fits nicely. -- Heiko Wundram Product & Application Development
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200708101138.43372.wundram>