Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:45:27 +0100 From: cpghost <cpghost@cordula.ws> To: John Almberg <jalmberg@identry.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No spam??? Message-ID: <20080115154527.GA15932@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> In-Reply-To: <360AB6AE-B3C1-4CA6-AFC1-378B48B3C6DF@identry.com> References: <87A9631B-EAC5-41B8-B4C2-001C3ADBA486@identry.com> <200801150237.m0F2bqEg000116@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <360AB6AE-B3C1-4CA6-AFC1-378B48B3C6DF@identry.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 08:48:32AM -0500, John Almberg wrote: > I've been doing some more digging since my last post, and have figured out > that the spam is not being blocked by pf, as I suspected (since it wasn't > showing up in my spam folder), but by spamassassin blacklists. > > The smtp log file has lots of entries like: > > 2008-01-14 09:30:37.074087500 rblsmtpd: 123.20.89.67 pid 72121: 451 > http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=123.20.89.67 > 2008-01-14 09:31:05.271514500 rblsmtpd: 58.227.241.97 pid 72122: 451 > Dynamic IP Addresses See: http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?58.227.241.97 > 2008-01-14 09:31:17.404943500 rblsmtpd: 41.196.155.56 pid 72123: 451 > http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=41.196.155.56 > 2008-01-14 09:31:18.304682500 rblsmtpd: 123.20.89.67 pid 72124: 451 > http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=123.20.89.67 > > So raises the same point that Oliver makes: how trustworthy are these > blacklists? YMMV, of course! I'm using spamhaus.org's blacklists for quite some time (many years) to block spam in postfix and they've been VERY trustworthy so far. But I can't say the same for the others, which seem occasionally a little bit too eager/aggressive and accumulate way too many false positives. -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080115154527.GA15932>